翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Williams Township, Northampton County, Pennsylvania ・ Williams Township, Pennsylvania ・ Williams Township, Sangamon County, Illinois ・ Williams tube ・ Williams Unified School District ・ Williams v Attorney-General ・ Williams v Bayley ・ Williams v Carwardine ・ Williams v Commonwealth ・ Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd ・ Williams v Hensman ・ Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd ・ Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd ・ Williams v The Queen ・ Williams V-Jet II ・ Williams v. Florida ・ Williams v. Lee ・ Williams v. Mississippi ・ Williams v. North Carolina (1942) ・ Williams v. Price ・ Williams v. Pryor ・ Williams v. Rhodes ・ Williams v. Vidmar ・ Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. ・ Williams Valley Railroad ・ Williams Valley School District ・ Williams Village ・ Williams W-17 Stinger ・ Williams Way, Gibraltar ・ Williams X-Jet Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Williams v. Florida ： ウィキペディア英語版 Williams v. Florida ''Williams v. Florida'', 399 U.S. 78 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fifth Amendment does not entitle a defendant in a criminal trial to refuse to provide details of his alibi witnesses to the prosecution, and that the Sixth Amendment does not require a jury to have 12 members. == Background == Williams had been convicted of robbery in Florida and sentenced to life imprisonment. Williams's defense had been alibi, and Florida law required him to notify the prosecution, in advance of the trial, of the names of his alibi witnesses, so that the prosecution could try to obtain rebuttal evidence. Williams argued that the requirement to assist the prosecution in this way violated his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself. Also, in 1967 Florida had reduced the number of jurors in all non-capital cases from 12 to 6, and so Williams had been convicted by a jury of six. Williams argued that the Sixth Amendment not only guaranteed the right to a jury trial, but also required that a jury must have all the characteristics it had under the common law, including that it consist of 12 persons. The Florida District Court of Appeal ruled against Williams on both issues. The Florida Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction to hear the case, and in 1969 the US Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Williams v. Florida」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.